Free Consent Order Template UK: What to Include (2026)

By mark 15 June 2026 10 min read
Illustration of legal consent order documents highlighting the risks of using free consent order templates during a UK divorce.

Free Consent Order Template UK: What to Include (and Where DIY Templates Go Wrong)

If you’re searching for a free consent order template, you’re probably trying to formalise a financial agreement with your ex-partner without paying full solicitor fees. That’s a completely reasonable place to start — this guide shows you exactly what a consent order needs to contain, gives you example wording for the most common clauses, and flags the specific mistakes that get DIY consent orders rejected by the court.

What a Consent Order Actually Is

A consent order is a legally binding document that the court approves (“seals”) to finalise the financial arrangements between divorcing or separating couples — covering things like property, pensions, savings, and ongoing maintenance. Without one, either of you can bring a financial claim against the other years later, even after the divorce itself is finalised.

To get a consent order sealed, you need two things:

  1. Form D81 — a statement of information about your finances, submitted alongside the order
  2. The consent order itself — the drafted legal document setting out exactly what’s been agreed

Free Consent Order Template: What to Include

A consent order isn’t just a written agreement — it needs specific legal wording and structure for a judge to approve it. At minimum, it should cover:

  • Recitals — background context (e.g. confirming both parties have taken independent legal advice, or a statement if they haven’t)
  • Property provisions — how the family home or other property is to be transferred, sold, or retained, including timing and any charge (Mesher order) if a sale is deferred
  • Pension sharing/attachment orders — the exact percentage or value being shared, and the pension provider’s details, drafted precisely enough for the pension company to implement it
  • Lump sum orders — any one-off payments, with clear amounts and deadlines
  • Spousal maintenance terms — amount, frequency, and end date (or a clean break clause if neither party will pay the other ongoing maintenance)
  • A clean break clause, if applicable — this is the wording that prevents either person from making a financial claim against the other in future
  • Child maintenance provisions — note that the CMS (Child Maintenance Service) usually has jurisdiction here, not the court, so this section is often limited

Example wording: clean break clause

“Upon the pronouncement of the Decree Absolute/Final Order neither party shall be entitled to make any further application for periodical payments, secured periodical payments or an order for a lump sum against the other, save as provided for in this Order.”

Example wording: pension sharing order

“There shall be a pension sharing order in relation to the Petitioner’s [pension scheme name and reference], the pension sharing percentage being [X]%.”

(These are illustrative structural examples only — the exact wording that will be accepted depends on the pension provider’s own drafting requirements and the specifics of your case.)

Where Free Templates Go Wrong

This is the part most template guides skip. In practice, the most common reasons a court rejects a DIY consent order — or approves it and it later causes problems — are:

  • Pension wording that the pension provider can’t implement. Generic templates use placeholder pension clauses that don’t match the specific administrative wording each pension scheme requires. If the wording is wrong, the pension company will reject the transfer even after the court has sealed the order.
  • Missing or incomplete Form D81. The court needs full financial disclosure alongside the order. An incomplete or inconsistent D81 is one of the most common reasons applications are sent back.
  • No clean break clause where one was intended. Without it, you can be pursued for spousal maintenance — or bring a claim yourself — years after the divorce, even after remarriage in some circumstances.
  • Vague property provisions. “The house will be sold and proceeds split” isn’t precise enough — the court wants defined percentages, timeframes, and what happens if one party won’t cooperate with a sale.
  • Wording copied from a template that doesn’t reflect your actual agreement. Templates are written for a generic case. If your situation includes a business, overseas assets, or a deferred sale, the standard clauses usually need real amendment, not just filling in blanks.

Is a Template Ever Enough on Its Own?

If your situation is genuinely simple — no children, no pensions, no property, a straightforward 50/50 split of modest savings — a template may be closer to workable. But even then, the wording still needs to satisfy the court and be drafted so it’s enforceable, and a rejected application means resubmitting (and paying the court fee again).

For anything involving a pension, a property, or a business, the risk of rejection — or of a clean break clause that doesn’t actually hold up — goes up significantly.

A Fixed-Fee Alternative to DIY

If you’d rather not risk a rejected application or a gap in your clean break, we draft consent orders professionally from £159, fixed fee — no hourly billing, and we handle the D81 and court submission for you.

See our fixed-fee consent order service

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use a free template for my consent order?

You can, but courts frequently reject template-based orders that use generic pension or property wording. A rejected application means resubmitting and paying the court fee again.

What happens if my DIY consent order gets rejected by the court?

The court will typically send it back with a request for amendments, or reject it outright if the wording doesn’t meet legal requirements. You’ll need to correct and resubmit it, which can add weeks or months to the process.

Can I change a consent order after it’s been sealed by the court?

Only in limited circumstances — generally you’d need to apply to vary it, and the court will only agree in specific situations (e.g. a significant change in circumstances for certain types of order). This is why getting the wording right the first time matters.

What if I didn’t account for my ex’s pension in the template?

If a pension isn’t addressed in the order, either of you may be able to bring a claim against it later — even after the case is otherwise settled. Pensions are one of the most commonly mishandled elements in DIY consent orders.

What’s the real cost of getting a consent order wrong?

Beyond the resubmission and court fees, an incomplete clean break can leave you exposed to a financial claim years later — including against future earnings, property, or a new pension — with legal costs to defend it that far exceed what professional drafting would have cost upfront.

Can You Use ChatGPT to Write a Financial Consent Order?

It’s a fair question if you’ve already used AI to draft an email or summarise a document, so why not a consent order? The short answer: yes, AI can produce something that reads like a legal document, but family courts in England and Wales regularly reject AI-drafted consent orders.

The problem isn’t the wording, it’s what’s underneath it. A consent order has to follow a specific structure that judges expect to see: standard recitals, statutory dismissal language, and formatting conventions that have built up around family law in England and Wales. A general-purpose AI tool has no way of knowing these conventions, and no way of checking its output against them. It will happily produce a document that looks plausible and gets rejected by the court, at which point you’ve lost time and, if you’ve already paid a court fee, potentially money too.

4 Hidden Dangers of an AI-Drafted Consent Order

1. Jurisdictional hallucinations

AI models are trained on legal text from all over the world. Ask for a “financial consent order” and there’s a real risk you’ll get a document that quietly blends English and Welsh family law with US state law, or leans on case law and precedent that’s out of date or doesn’t apply here at all. Unless you already know family law well enough to spot the difference, you won’t notice until a judge does.

2. The Form D81 mismatch

Every consent order application needs to be filed alongside a Statement of Information, Form D81, which sets out both parties’ financial circumstances. The order and the D81 need to tell the same story. An AI tool can write you a standalone order, but it has no way of cross-referencing that order against your D81 figures. Any discrepancy between the two, even a small one, is an immediate red flag to the judge reviewing your application.

3. Flawed pension sharing annexes

If your settlement involves splitting a pension, the order needs a pension sharing annex written in exact, scheme-compliant administrative language. Pension trustees and scheme administrators are strict about this wording, and generic AI-generated text is very unlikely to pass muster. Even in the unlikely event a judge approves it, the pension provider can still reject it, leaving you with an order that simply doesn’t work.

4. The “clean break” loophole

A clean break clause is meant to close the door on either of you making a financial claim against the other in future. If that clause is poorly worded or too generic, and AI-generated versions often are, it doesn’t do its job. That defeats the entire point of getting a consent order in the first place, and it can leave you exposed to a claim years down the line when you least expect it.

Where AI Is Useful, and Where It Isn’t

AI tools aren’t useless in this process, they’re just useful for a narrower job than people expect.

What AI can help with: listing out the assets and liabilities you and your ex need to agree on, drafting talking points for an initial conversation, or explaining legal terminology in plain English so you understand what you’re being asked to agree to.

What AI can’t do: take legal accountability for the document, assess whether your agreement is fair under Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, or offer any guarantee that a court will approve it. Those are judgement calls that require someone who is actually qualified and regulated to make them.

Get It Drafted Properly the First Time

If you and your ex have already agreed your settlement, you don’t need to pay for a full solicitor-led negotiation, but you do need the paperwork itself to be right. That’s exactly what our Assisted Consent Order service is for: your order is drafted by a solicitor, your Form A is prepared, and your application is filed at court, all for a fixed fee of £399 inc. VAT.

Don’t let a court rejection waste your time and your court fees. Have your agreed terms reviewed and professionally drafted by regulated specialists, so it gets sealed the first time.

Call us or request a call back

Request A Free Call Back

Please provide a brief note on your financial agreement and requirements so our team can prepare for the call.